Skip to content

Ancient Egyptian Medicine

Ancient Egyptian medicine provides some of the earliest surviving written evidence of medical practice. Medical papyri record treatments, prescriptions, symptoms and surgical procedures, revealing how people in ancient Egypt attempted to diagnose and treat illness. Medical practice combined practical observation with religious beliefs, while knowledge of the human body developed partly through practices such as mummification. These sources make ancient Egypt an important period in the history of medicine.

Anubis, ancient Egyptian god of embalming and mummification, depicted in a tomb painting beside a reclining figure, illustrating Egyptian medicine, burial practices and beliefs about the afterlife.
Ancient Egyptian tomb painting of Anubis, god of embalming and mummification, attending a reclining figure, illustrating Egyptian funerary practices, religious beliefs and the afterlife.

Evidence of Ancient Egyptian Medicine

Our understanding of Egyptian medicine comes from several types of evidence. Medical papyri are particularly important because they preserve written descriptions of illnesses, remedies and procedures. Two of the best-known examples are the Ebers Papyrus and the Edwin Smith Papyrus. They contain different types of medical information, from prescriptions and remedies to detailed examinations of injuries.

The Edwin Smith Papyrus is notable for its systematic descriptions of injuries, examinations, diagnoses and prognoses. Its cases include head wounds and other physical trauma. The Ebers Papyrus contains a much wider collection of remedies and treatments for different conditions. Together, these documents show that Egyptian medical practice included observation and practical treatment, although some remedies also involved religious words or rituals.

Other evidence comes from tomb paintings, inscriptions, archaeological discoveries and human remains. These sources help historians investigate medical practitioners, religious beliefs and attitudes towards death. They must nevertheless be interpreted carefully: a religious image does not necessarily demonstrate how a particular illness was treated, and the preservation of a body does not provide a complete record of medical knowledge.

Doctors and medical practice

Ancient Egyptian medical practitioners treated a range of complaints, from wounds and fractures to digestive problems and other illnesses. The surviving papyri show that treatments could include preparations made from plants, minerals and animal products. Remedies were sometimes accompanied by spoken formulae or religious practices.

The roles and status of medical practitioners varied. Some individuals held recognised positions within Egyptian society, and inscriptions provide evidence of people associated with particular medical responsibilities. To explore the evidence for practitioners and their work, see Doctors in Ancient Egypt.

Religion and medicine

Religion was an important part of ancient Egyptian life, and medical treatment could involve both practical measures and religious beliefs. The surviving medical texts include remedies accompanied by incantations, while Egyptian religious traditions associated particular deities with health, protection and healing.

This does not mean that Egyptian medicine relied entirely on supernatural explanations. The papyri also record observations of symptoms, methods of examining patients and treatments intended to address physical problems. Religious and practical approaches could exist alongside one another. The relationship between belief and treatment is explored in Religion and Medicine in Ancient Egypt.

Surgery in Ancient Egypt

The Edwin Smith Papyrus provides important evidence of the assessment and treatment of injuries. Its case studies describe wounds, fractures and head injuries, sometimes setting out whether a condition could be treated, was uncertain or was likely to prove fatal. This gives historians insight into the practical observation used in at least some areas of Egyptian medicine.

However, the existence of detailed descriptions does not mean that Egyptian surgeons could successfully treat every injury or perform operations comparable to modern surgery. The evidence must be considered in its historical context. Read more about the procedures and evidence in Surgery in Ancient Egypt.

Mummification and medical knowledge

Mummification was primarily connected with Egyptian beliefs about death and the afterlife. The preservation of the body was considered important to the continuation of existence after death. The process involved treating the body and removing or preserving particular organs, although methods changed over time and varied according to the period and the resources available.

Mummification provides evidence about Egyptian practices involving the human body, but it should not be treated as proof of a complete understanding of anatomy. Religious requirements shaped the process, and the knowledge gained through preparing bodies did not necessarily translate into medical understanding. The subject is examined in Mummification and Medical Knowledge in Ancient Egypt.

Alexandria and the development of medicine

Alexandria became an important centre of scholarship in the Hellenistic period, following the conquests of Alexander the Great and the establishment of the Ptolemaic kingdom. Its intellectual environment brought together traditions and ideas from different parts of the Mediterranean world. Developments associated with Alexandria belong to a later period than the earliest Egyptian medical papyri and should be considered in that wider historical context.

Find out more about this later phase in Medicine in Alexandria.

Ancient Egyptian medicine provides valuable evidence for comparing medical practice across time. The survival of written medical texts allows historians to investigate Egyptian treatments in greater detail than is possible for prehistoric communities. Later developments can be compared with medicine in Ancient Greece and medicine in Ancient Rome, helping to identify differences in medical knowledge, practice and explanations of disease.