{"id":4852,"date":"2018-08-29T09:08:32","date_gmt":"2018-08-29T09:08:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/schoolshistory.org.uk\/topics\/?p=4852"},"modified":"2019-08-08T19:34:08","modified_gmt":"2019-08-08T19:34:08","slug":"stansfield-south-west","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/schoolshistory.org.uk\/topics\/stansfield-south-west\/","title":{"rendered":"Stansfield on the South West in the Wars of the Roses"},"content":{"rendered":"

Regional studies of the Wars of the Roses are widespread. Like any civil war, the conflict had ramifications around the country. Studies of the way in which the conflict impacted upon regional governance, landownership and society in general result from this. They are intended to provide further depth of understanding. They can provide the missing links between the upper echelons of the nobility and the people living their everyday lives. Done well, they illustrate all manner of things, from the way in which armies were raised and maintained, to the consequences of the wars on the local economy etc. Here, we see a study of the political elite of the south west of England being reviewed.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Arms
The Coat of Arms of Thomas Courtenay, Earl of Devon. NOT included in this study of the south west<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The main body of the book is divided into five chronological chapters which in turn examine the final decade of Henry VI\u2019s reign, Edward IV\u2019s first reign and the Lancastrian Readeption, the second reign of Edward IV, the reign of Richard III, and the first 15 years of Henry VII.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Setting a study out in chronological or thematic chapters is the norm. The structure suggests that the author will address the political elites as a consequence of major turning points.<\/p>\n

This could have been an important study, but unfortunately the wheels come off at an early stage. Stansfield\u2019s regional approach is interesting and valid, but he is forced to conclude even in his opening chapter that the wider southwest including Somerset and Dorset, as well as Devon and Cornwall, did not constitute a region under any of the possible criteria that he examines.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Clarity is key. Some regions were well formed in terms of governance. It was possible to show the role of regional centres in rule over them. Applying modern regional terminology to the later middle ages, as done here, can present a rather disjointed history. The areas are important, studying them is valid and important, they are not however the same political regions as they are today. It is further complicated by the practise of granting lands around the country, rather than in one concentrated area.<\/p>\n

This might not necessary be fatal, were each county competently studied. Regrettably, however, the author displays a distinct aversion to archival research<\/strong> which undermines his conclusions, such as they are. The reader is told that this book is to be considered \u2018a work of synthesis\u2019, but it is hard not to feel that this is code for the author\u2019s reluctance to set foot in a record repository. As a result, Stansfield has barely, if at all, scratched the surface of the archival material available for each of his four counties. Just five family collections have been consulted, chosen<\/strong> \u2013 as is painfully obvious \u2013 not for the particular importance of the families concerned, or with a view to even geographical coverage, but for the simple rationale<\/strong> that a calendared form of the records could be accessed online<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There is a wealth of information available about regions and centrally. Archives held in London cover government and some regional aspects. Family archives are often available. Chronicles exist in some regions. There are letters and diaries pertinent to some parts of the country and aspects of the wars. Economic figures are available, in part at least, for some places. Some has been digitised and is available online to academic historians via subscription sites. Other elements are catalogued online.<\/p>\n

The author\u2019s lack of industry where archival work is concerned has also determined his choice of methodology. His opening chapters set out the problems and pitfalls inherent in the study of late medieval political structures and networks in some detail, but the solution he offers is far from satisfactory. Seeking ways of addressing questions of retaining, affinity and connexion while avoiding extensive archival researches, he arrives at a quantitative method of analysis pioneered by Scottish historians.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Book being reviewed:<\/h4>\n

Political Elites in South-West England, 1450-1500: Politics, Governance, and the Wars of the Roses<\/strong>
\nRobert Stansfield\u00a0Lampeter, Edwin Mellen Press,\u00a02009<\/span>, ISBN: 9780773447141; 550pp.; Price: \u00a384.95<\/p>\n

Review Details<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dr Hannes Kleineke, review of\u00a0Political Elites in South-West England, 1450-1500: Politics, Governance, and the Wars of the Roses<\/em>, (review no. 885)
\nhttps:\/\/www.history.ac.uk\/reviews\/review\/885<\/a>
\nDate accessed: 29 August, 2018<\/p>\n

Questions to consider:<\/strong><\/p>\n